| References: |
o Morgenthau Hans J. (1948) Politics Among Nations. New York, NY: Knopf.
o Gilpin, R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.∗
o Griffiths, M (Ed.) (2007) International Relations Theory for the Twenty-First Century. London and New York: Routledge. (From here on IRT)
o Bell, D (2009) “Writing the World: Disciplinary History and Beyond” International Affairs, 85(1): 3-22.
o Bell, D. (Ed.) (2007). Victorian Visions of Global Order. Cambridge: CUP.
o Brown, C (2016) “Review Article: International Political Theory Today” Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 45(2)
o Brown, C (2000) “International Political Theory: a British Social Science?” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2(1).
o Hobson, J (2012) The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics. Cambridge: CUP. Special Forum on Hobson’s book in Millennium 42(2) (2014).
o Hoffman, S (1987) “An American Social Science: International Relations” Deadalus 106(3): 41-60.
o Jackson, PT (2010) The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. New York: Routledge.
o Schmidt, B (1998) The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. New York: SUNY Press.
o Shilliam, R (2011) “The Perilious but the Unavoidable Terrain of the Non-West” in Shilliam, R (Ed.) IR and Non-Western Thought. London: Routledge.
o Special Issues: Dealing with Difference: Problems and Possibilities for Dialogue in IR” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39 (3).
o Tickner, A (2013) “Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations” European Journal of International Relations, 19(3).
o Tickner, A and Blaney, D (Eds.) (2012) Thinking IR Differently. London: Routledge.
o Vitalis, R (2005) “Birth of a Discipline” in Lon and Schmidt (Eds.) Imperialism and Internationalism in the Discipline of IR. New York: SUNY Press.
o Waever, O (1998) “The sociology of a not so international discipline” International Organization.
o Wight, M (1960) “Why is there no international theory?” International Relations, 2(1)
o Cox, R (1981) “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10(2)
o Walker, RBJ (1993) “International Relations as Political Theory” in Walker, RBJ Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge: CUP.
o Rosenberg, J (2017) “International Relations in the Prison of Social Science” International Relations 30(2): 127-153
o Hamati-Ataya, I (2013) “Reflectivity, Reflexivity, Reflexivism: IR’s “Reflexive Turn” –and Beyond” European Journal of International Studies19(4):6693694.
o Special Issue, “The End of International Relations Theory?” Dunne, T, Hansen, L, Wight, C (Eds.) (2013) European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2013..
o Morgenthau, H (1948) “International Politics: A Dual Approach” in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace
o Waltz, K (1979) “Reductionist and Systemic Theories” in Theory of International Politics. Reading, Massachussets: Addison-Wesley PC.
o Waltz, K., (1959) Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
o Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
o Williams, MC. “The Hobbesian Theory of International Relations: Three Traditions,” in Jahn, B (Ed). Classical Theory in International Relations. Cambridge: CUP.
o Bull, H (1977) “The Concept of Order in World Politics” in The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Palgrave.
o Clark, I (2009) “Towards an English School Theory of Hegemony”, EJIR 15(2): 203-228.
o Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
o Wendt. A. (1998) “On Constitution and Causation in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 24 (5): 101–118.
o Axelrod, R and Keohane, R (1985) “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions” World Politics 38: 226-254.
o Mearsheimer, John J. and Stephen M. Walt (2013) “Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing Is Bad for International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 427–457.
o Price, R (1995) “A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo” International Organization 49(1): 73-103.
o Anievas, A, Nisancioglu, K (2015) “The Ottoman-Habsburg Rivalry over the Long Sixteenth Century” in How the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism, London: Pluto Press.
o Brown, C (1994) “’Turtles All the Way Down’: Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory and IR” Millennium 23(2): 213-236.
o Der Derian, J (2000) “Virtuous War/Virtual Theory” International Affairs pp.771-788
o Tickner, J.A., True, J. (2018) “A Century of International Feminism: From World War 1 Women’s Peace Pragmatism to the Women, Peace and Security Agenda” International Studies Quarterly 62(2): 221-233.
o Tickner, A (2003), “Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World” Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 32(2).
o Tickner, Arlene (2013) “Core, Periphery and (neo) Imperialist International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 627–646.
o Muppidi, H (2012) “Shame and Rage” in Colonial Signs of International Relations. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
o Sajed, A (2019) “How we fight: Anticolonial Imagineries and the Question of National Liberation in the Algerian War” Interventions
|
|
